Please take a seat before continuing: the contemporary "privileged class" within Western developed nations no longer lives with and abides by free-market economics.  Yes, the free-market system, the economic model that brought us a dizzying array of automobiles, ice cream choices and little blue pills to help men achieve and sustain erections, a species-limiting condition reinforced by the fact that men hardly move physically anymore and ingest 4,000 calories a day from optional foods such as processed turkey hot pockets, 44oz carbonated beverages and FUNYUNS®.  Sadly, as it turns out, the free-market system only applies to those too weak to elevate themselves above and beyond the fair, objective rules that govern this Utopian economic model.

First, we need to acknowledge that there are different definitions of free-markets.  To some, the free-market is an economic system that is governed purely by private industry, not subject to any government taxation or regulation.  To others, the free market is narrowly defined as a system of allocating goods within a society which abides by the laws of supply and demand.  But, for the purpose of my article, free-market refers to a system where there is no intervention and regulation by a government except to enforce contracts and the ownership of property.

Believe me when I tell you I'm a big supporter of capitalism.  It would be hard to argue against the quality of life improvements generated by free-markets and a capitalist society.  For example, even as this flawed economic system (acknowledging any economic model is flawed) starts to wipe out the middle class and moves society inevitably back towards feudalism, the level of poverty witnessed in Western Europe and the United States of America pales (no pun intended) in comparison to the abject poverty chronically assaulting developing economies (please see my blog post, Life in Lubango, for a limited glimpse into hardships faced by these Angolans).

However, a new era of capitalism has emerged since the end of World War II.  The Military Industrial Complex that Dwight D. Eisenhower presciently warned the USA to guard against in his farewell speech on January 17, 1961 has evolved into what Naomi Klein terms Disaster Capitalism, where predatory organizations of all forms (e.g. banking, oil, private security, et al) gorge on the carcasses of devastated cities, countries and regions.  And, as I recently wrote in my blog post, "The Strength of Private Fundamentals", the world investment banking system turned the table in 2008 and audaciously went after the developed economies, as well.

Most hypocritically, these international investment and insurance organizations learned that they can camouflage their anti-competitive and illegal activities by cloaking themselves in the mantle of free-market ideology and declare themselves feudal lords over their fiefdoms.  We have been hijacked by the largest corporations in history and they just created a new dual economy in America, where one sector is geared to local needs and another to the global market.

To demonstrate this new reality, President Obama officially signed the Small Business Jobs Act yesterday, September 27, 2010.  I am extremely grateful for this new act.  First, barring unforeseen developments, I am about to become a small business owner, and our small business is in desperate need of liquidity (short-term cash flow) right now. And second, I am not in the privileged class; I am subject to the confines of free market capitalism.  In fact, even if I had the choice, I wouldn't choose the "privileged class" economic model that executives and high-end traders at Goldman Sachs get to manipulate.  In my opinion, it is immoral, completely unethical, illegal and destructive to the common good of society . . . and I'm a big fan of morality, ethics and the common good.

Now, let's put this in perspective.  Community banks are to support small businesses by having $42 billion injected into their coffers to kick-start lending.  Also, let's not overlook the fact that over a $1 trillion in funding was given to international investment banking organizations to unfreeze lending, increase hiring and keep the world from entering a global depression.  Of course, the largest banks used the money to pay off their pals, allow competitors to go bankrupt, purchase small banking competitors . . . or they simply kept it for a rainy day; lending certainly didn't ensue.  So it seems a bit two-faced to say that these smaller, community banks should actually do what their colossal peers refused and continue to refuse to this day.

And here's another disturbing question: what is $42 billion compared to $1 trillion?  Well, $1 trillion is $1000 billion. Therefore, this means the amount of money being given to community banks to increase lending and hiring for small businesses for the entire US is 4.2% of what taxpayers gave to the richest scumbags in the world.

However, let's take a moment of pause.  According to the US Small Business Administration (SBA):
  • Small businesses make up more than 99.7% of all employers.
  • Small businesses create more than 50 percent of the non-farm private gross domestic product (GDP).
  • Small patenting firms produce 13 to 14 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms.
  • The 22.9 million small businesses in the United States are located in virtually every neighborhood.
  • Small businesses employ about 50 percent of all private sector workers.
  • Home-based businesses account for 53 percent of all small businesses.
  • Small businesses make up 97 percent of exporters and produce 29 percent of all export value.
  • Small businesses with employees start-up at a rate of over 500,000 per year.
  • Four years after start-up, half of all small businesses with employees remain open.
  • The latest figures show that small businesses create 75 percent of the net new jobs in our economy.
Well, I'm sorry, but this is criminal!  Wake up, America!  We cannot be so blind that we fail to recognize the economic paradigm shift unveiling right before our very own eyes.  The richest 1% of the world that produces 50% of the US GDP is worth $1 trillion and the rest of us are only worth 4.2% of that amount?! And we are fighting for our lives in a true free-market economy while they get to write off all their losses to the taxpayers' tab?  This is in broad daylight, for crap's sake!!!

Matt Taibbi recently wrote a series of scathing articles regarding what he believes is really going down behind the scenes, inside the free-market mantle that obfuscates the too-big-to-fails' sordid, shady activities.  The first article that impressed me was, "The Great American Bubble Machine", in the July 9-23 2009 Rolling Stone.  Please read it for yourself, but the gist of it relates to how Goldman Sachs gets into a market privately, then artificially creates a massive financial bubble within that industry and reaps massive profits.  From the housing bubble to the imminent "Cap and Trade" policy, Goldman Sachs is in there first, investing in private or otherwise non-accessible financial vehicles.  Then they invest even more to fuel a bubble market and, as we just saw in 2008, they walk away completely unscathed by taxpayer bailouts when the market collapses; they are beyond any financial accountability and reproach, which is completely against the free-market system that enriches them daily.

Another article demanding your attention is Taibbi's March 31, 2010, "Looting Main Street", a damning indictment of the unfair, illegal and immoral activities of banks and their executives, executives who apparently will never see a day in jail for enriching themselves while destroying and enslaving American counties, states and foreign countries, alike.  Accordingly to Taibbi, the state of California, the city of Chicago and the country of Greece are all similarly rigged by these too-large-to-fail corporate pirates.  So, speaking of corporate pirates in parting, I wish to leave you with this  appropriate Monty Python short film from their 1983 movie, The Meaning of Life.  It's quite relevant . . . and a hoot!
 


Comments

09/28/2010 4:20pm

Tom, this time I'm not sure I understand what you want from the U.S. and from Goldman Sachs. I think your main point is there really is no free market. I might agree with you to some extent, but I don't understand how you get one. Fore example, Dems pressured banks to loan money to people who couldn't afford mortgages, so we had the housing bubble. They tilted the free market, and now want to bail these folks out, again thwarting the free market.

My solution would be reasonable regulation and the attempt to promote a true free market, but I admit that doing this requires not only genius, but political will.

The government determining how much profit a company can earn, or to whom they need to lend, is interfering with the free market, and it never works.

Bubbles always occur. I wish they didn't, but people always get too excited about (housing, tech stocks, etc.), and then too pessimistic, and people take advantage of all this.

Well, it's an article that made me think, so thanks.

Reply
09/29/2010 8:14am

I meant to say my last sentence in the above comment more positively. What I meant is that I appreciate the article because it really made me think. These are the issues that are super important as we determine what kind of economy we want in the future, and intelligent dialogue such as yours is encouraging.

Thanks.

Reply
09/29/2010 11:35pm

Hi Rock! Thanks for both of your comments! I really appreciate your thoughts, concerns, feedback and support.

Indeed, Americans (and all nations, I will add) really need to find new economic solutions. As I stated above, I don't believe there is a perfect economic model because we live in a very complex, dynamic universe. Creating wealth through free and fair competition, science, R&D, discoveries and entrepreneurial spirit is great; we have many, many lifestyle luxuries (and when I say that, I mean we don't have to labor and toil so hard to secure food and water, we have excellent health care--regardless of what people think of the current health care policy--we don't have to fight to survive winters, etc.). However, we always need to be mindful of the needy and we cannot simply castigate them and write them off as dead weight. Not everyone can compete equally and earn the same level of lifestyle but we must ensure that people have their basic needs met; it's often not their fault that they're on the bottom of the economic ladder, and there's more than enough wealth to make sure they have adequate food, water, clothing, shelter, education and health care.

For example, increasing taxes on the super rich to 39% (from 36%) seems more than fair and could provide serious answers to several of our current economic issues. An additional 3% tax is completely immaterial to the super rich, other than they get extremely pissy because they want more money than they could ever need.

We also don't need to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on advancing our military each year. We can then start spending some of that money (not all, mind you; I believe we need a capable military) on creating alternative energy sources (so we don't need such a huge military to protect our access to oil), finding cures for cancer, creating better schools for our children, etc.

These are just a few thoughts. However, to address your first comments, what I am saying is the following:

1. We now have a dual economy in the US; there's the truly capitalist (aka free market with no intervention and regulation by a government except to enforce contracts and the ownership of property) that 98% of us reside in and a new anti-competitive, corrupt and above-the-law economy comprised the richest (aka most powerful) people and multinational organizations. The latter can dictate global policy, rig markets to their exclusive benefit and then pawn off their losses to the state where 98% of us pay the bill for their reckless financial orgies.

2. Capitalism is the greatest of known economic models, in terms of development and increasing the quality of life for many people, but it cannot be left unregulated. Greed will always prevail if given the chance and it will come at the cost of many developing nations, where the overwhelming majority of its citizens are completely victimized and helpless to change their lot in life.

3. Dwight D. Eisenhower and subsequently many others warned us of the dangers inherent in allowing monstrous corporations to operate unchecked. First it was the Military Industrial Complex (that profits immensely from major global as well as low-intensity regional conflicts). Now it has evolved into the industrial and financial behemoths that plague the earth today.

4. The industrial and financial behemoths are unaccountable to the rule of law. Global investment banks like JP Morgan can openly buy the elected leaders of a county, destroy that county's economy and most fiendishly re-rig their crappy deals to enslave them for the rest of their natural born lives. The most they may receive is a paltry fine for their crimes, while the majority of people outside their powerful realm go to jail for similar or less crimes.

5. People can only take so much of this corruption and abuse. There is a breaking point for all things and, from my perspective, the scams and lies of these corrupt government officials (e.g. Henry Paulson, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, et al) and the too-large-to-fail organizations associated with them is becoming more and more apparent. They have plundered the developing world for centuries, and they are either running out of steam with those victimized continents or they simply want more, so they are now plundering the most developed world economies. Whatever the case, I believe they are flying on fumes and their reign will eventually crumble, but it will come at a dear cost to the majority of us.

Reply



Leave a Reply